There is a continual debate between
those to accept the Bible as the Word of God and those you believe
truth is found only through science. The truth is that observable
science and the Bible agree 100% of the time. However, scientists and
the Bible do not always agree. Scientists often take the observed
facts and use them to support their conjectures about how the world
was created. This is were the disagreements originate.
Have you been told that the theory of evolution is an established facts that is accepted by
all creditable scientists? Do you believe it? If you do, you have
been brainwashed into believing that you have the best paper airplane
ever made.
Have you been told that Einstein's
Theory of Relativity has stood the test of time and its correctness
is beyond the realm of doubt. Now, Google “E=mc2 wrong”. I got
over 33,000 hits.
Read some of the links and you will
find out that physicists working at CERN believe they may have
discovered neutrinos that travel faster than light. You see its a
theory, not a fact. It explained our observation correctly until
better instrumentation was used, better methodology was followed, or
maybe just conducting an experiment in a different manner produces
new results that can not be explained by this theory. If Einstein's
work is now in doubt, could we possible find reason to doubt the work
of Darwin? Did Darwin find reason to doubt his own work?
Have you been told that Charles Darwin
found reason to disbelieve his own hypothesis that help form the
foundation for the theory of evolution? He said “To suppose that
the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus
to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and
for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have
been formed by natural selection, seems, I confess, absurd in the
highest degree...The difficulty of believing that a perfect and
complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable
by our imagination, should not be considered subversive of the
theory.”1 Only someone brainwashed (intellectually
blind) could have these thoughts and understand the complexity then
say it happened by chance.
Have you actually read Charles
Darwin's books. Here is a quote to consider. “These difficulties
and objections may be classed under the following heads:—First,
why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations,
do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not
all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see
them, well defined? Secondly, is it possible that an animal having,
for instance, the structure and habits of a bat, could have been
formed by the modification of some other animal with widely different
habits and structure? Can we believe that natural selection could
produce, on the one hand, an organ of trifling importance, such as
the tail of a giraffe, which serves as a fly-flapper, and, on the
other hand, an organ so wonderful as the eye?
Thirdly, can instincts be acquired
and modified through natural selection? What shall we say to the
instinct which leads the bee to make cells, and which has practically
anticipated the discoveries of profound mathematicians?Fourthly, how
can we account for species, when crossed, being sterile and producing
sterile offspring, whereas, when varieties are crossed, their
fertility is unimpaired?” This
is for Darwin's Origin of Species, Chapter 6, page 133.
Are you a logical person? Are you a
free-thinker? Intellectually, are you from Missouri, the show me
state? All of us wants to answer yes. But, if you accept the theory
of evolution when the very people who help form the foundations upon
which it stand have serious doubt about it. Have you not been
brainwashed?
Why do we humans so quickly accept
that which we know can not be proven? Could it be that we believe
because we do not wish to believe the alternative.
People who do not wish to believe in
God must have some alternate theory as to how this all came about.
Since the firmaments declare the glory of God to such an extend that
every culture has a god(s) that created everything, they must have an
alternative to give to the masses. Since they know that you can fool
all the people some of the time and some of the people all the time
but you cannot fool all the people all the time. Then they know they
need a story and a procedure to discredit those you don't accept the
story. Who is they? Maybe you?
If not, could you just have been
intellectually blinded by all the volumes of material produced
calling theories facts. What is intellectual blindness?
Assuming what others say about a subject is true without
investigating the facts behind it. It is evidenced when someone
supports a position just because others tell them it is the truth.
What is true intellectual blindness? Being closed minded and not open
to the truth. Who are blind? Romans 1:28 And since they did
not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to
do what ought not to be done.
Have
you been blinded to the truth of the Bible? You may be intellectually
blinded if you don't know that the Bible revealed many scientific
facts before scientists discovered them. You may be intellectually
blinded if you don't know that the Bible contains more
predictions/prophecies that came to pass just as described than those
of all the prophecies/predictions of all the psychics combined.
Don't
believe me? Read my article Part Three.
No comments:
Post a Comment